Egyptian Origins and Norse Mythology Written Simultaneously-The Timing No One Talks About:


The Timeline Everyone Misses

11th-12th centuries: Irish scribes compile the Lebor Gabála Érenn (Book of the Taking of Ireland) and other texts documenting that the Gaels descended from Scota, an Egyptian princess, and traced their lineage directly to pharaonic Egypt.

https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2026/01/an-egpytian-gaelic-connection.html 

13th century: Norse mythology is written down for the first time in Iceland—by Christian scribes in a population that was heavily Norse-Gaelic mixed.

https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2026/01/iceland-meeting-point-of-irish-and.html 

These aren't separate events separated by centuries. They're simultaneous, overlapping textual projects by interconnected cultures.

 

What This Means

The Irish weren't writing down their Egyptian origin story in ancient times, lost in the mists of prehistory. They were documenting it in the 11th-12th centuries—and then immediately after, in the 13th century, the same Irish-influenced scribal culture was recording what we call "Norse mythology" in Iceland.

Let that sink in:

The people recording Norse mythology were contemporaries of—or descendants of—the Irish scribes who were documenting Gaelic Egyptian origins.

 

The Same Scribal Culture

When we talk about "Irish monks" or "Christian scribes" in Iceland recording Norse mythology, we need to be specific about who these people were and what they believed:

  • They were part of an Irish-influenced Christian scribal tradition
  • That tradition had, in the same era, documented that the Gaels descended from Egyptian royalty
  • They were writing in Iceland, where Norse and Gaels had extensively intermarried
  • Genetic studies confirm substantial Gaelic maternal ancestry in Iceland's founding population
  • By the 13th century, these weren't "Norse" or "Irish"—they were both

The scribes recording the Eddas and sagas believed they themselves carried Egyptian heritage through their Gaelic ancestry.

 

Not Separate Cultures—Overlapping Identities

Mainstream scholarship treats these as separate projects:

  • "Irish mythology" (including Scota) = Irish Christian monks in Ireland
  • "Norse mythology" = Icelandic Christian scribes in Iceland

But this misses the crucial point: These were the same scribal culture, the same time period, the same interconnected populations.

The Irish who documented their Egyptian origins and the "Icelanders" who documented Norse mythology weren't distinct peoples operating independently. They were:

  • Part of the same Christian church networks
  • Connected by Norse-Gaelic intermarriage and cultural mixing
  • Working within decades of each other
  • Using similar scribal techniques and frameworks
  • Sharing the belief that Gaelic culture descended from Egypt

 

What Were the Scribes Really Doing?

If we accept that:

  1. The Gaels understood themselves as Egyptian-descended (documented 11th-12th centuries)
  2. Norse and Gaels had mixed extensively in Iceland, Hebrides, Ireland
  3. The people recording Norse mythology in 13th-century Iceland were this mixed population
  4. These scribes were part of the same Irish-influenced Christian scribal tradition that documented Egyptian origins

Then what we call "Norse mythology" wasn't recorded by neutral observers preserving ancient pagan traditions. It was recorded by people who believed they carried Egyptian pharaonic and priestly lineage, writing down the traditions of the Norse people they had mixed with.

 

The Egyptian-Gaelic Lens

This changes everything about how we should read Norse mythology as it appears in the written sources:

  • Not: Pure Norse oral tradition → Christian scribes write it down → We read ancient Norse paganism
  • But: Norse oral tradition → Filtered through Egyptian-descended Gaelic cultural lens → Mixed population records it → We read a synthesis

The organizational structures, cosmological concepts, narrative frameworks, and theological ideas in the written Norse mythology may not be purely Norse at all—they may reflect how people with Egyptian-Mediterranean heritage understood and interpreted Norse stories.

 

The Scribes Knew Who They Were

This wasn't unconscious influence. The scribes recording these traditions in the 11th-13th centuries actively documented that they descended from Egypt. They weren't suffering from cultural amnesia—they knew exactly who they claimed to be:

  • Descendants of Scota, Egyptian princess
  • Inheritors of pharaonic royal lineage
  • Carriers of ancient Mediterranean wisdom traditions
  • Practitioners of Egyptian-derived monasticism

When these same people—or their immediate descendants and cultural inheritors—sat down to record "Norse" mythology, they did so from within that identity.

 

Why This Matters

The timing reveals that what we've been calling "Norse mythology" was:

  1. Never written down by "pure" Norse pagans (Christianity had already arrived)
  2. Recorded centuries after conversion (13th century, 200+ years after Iceland's official conversion ~1000 CE)
  3. Written by a mixed Norse-Gaelic population (genetic evidence confirms this)
  4. Created by scribes who believed they descended from Egyptian civilization (documented simultaneously in Irish texts)
  5. Shaped by people with Mediterranean cultural identity (through claimed Egyptian lineage)

 

The Convergence

Iceland wasn't just where Norse met Irish. It was where:

  • Norse oral traditions (Thor, Odin, the sagas)
  • Egyptian-descended Gaelic culture (Scota's descendants, Mediterranean heritage)
  • Christian scribal frameworks (literacy, organizational models)

All converged in the same place, at the same time, in the same people.

 

What We're Really Reading

When we read the Prose Edda or the Poetic Edda or the Icelandic sagas, we're not reading "Norse mythology" in some pure, unadulterated form. We're reading:

Norse content filtered through Egyptian-Gaelic cultural understanding, organized by Christian scribal methods, recorded by a mixed population that claimed pharaonic descent.

The mythology is Norse in content—but the lens through which it was understood, structured, and preserved may be fundamentally Egyptian-Mediterranean.

 

The Hidden Authors

Who really stands behind the Norse mythological texts?

Not anonymous "Norse pagans" transmitting ancient oral tradition.

Not neutral "Christian scribes" simply writing down what they heard.

But: Egyptian-descended Gaelic-Norse Christians synthesizing traditions they inherited from both sides of their ancestry, organizing them according to frameworks they understood through their claimed Mediterranean heritage.

 

Why Mainstream Scholarship Misses This

The standard narrative keeps these traditions artificially separate:

  • Scota legend = "Irish mythology" (dismissed as medieval fabrication)
  • Eddas and sagas = "Norse mythology" (treated as authentically Norse despite Christian scribes)

By separating them, scholarship misses that they were created by the same culture at the same time.

The moment you put them together—Irish scribes documenting Egyptian origins in the 11th-12th centuries, then Norse mythology recorded by Irish-influenced mixed populations in the 13th century—the picture changes completely.

 

The Real Question

If the people recording Norse mythology believed they descended from Egyptian royalty and carried Mediterranean wisdom traditions...

How much of what we call "Norse mythology" is actually Egyptian-Mediterranean frameworks applied to Norse stories?

We can't answer that question if we don't acknowledge the timing: these weren't separate projects separated by vast time and distance. They were simultaneous, interconnected, created by people who believed they carried Egyptian heritage.

 

Conclusion: Simultaneous, Not Sequential

The story we've been told:

  1. Ancient Norse oral traditions (pre-Christian)
  2. Christianity arrives (9th-11th centuries)
  3. Much later, Christian scribes write down old pagan stories (13th century)

The actual timeline:

  1. Irish document their Egyptian origins (11th-12th centuries)
  2. Immediately after, the same Irish-influenced scribal culture records "Norse" mythology in Iceland (13th century)
  3. Both projects undertaken by interconnected populations who believed in Gaelic Egyptian descent

These weren't different peoples at different times. They were the same culture doing related work in overlapping decades.

The Egyptian lineage isn't background information. It's the active cultural identity of the people who created the texts we call "Norse mythology."

That's not a footnote. That's the whole story.

 

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Irish American Law Enforcement

Image
Introduction: https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-shadowed-past-irish-organized-crime.html https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-knights-of-columbus-architect-of.html https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2025/07/irish-americans-in-law-enforcement.html https://irishcabal.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-dark-uniform-irish-american-law.html Black Nobility & Jesuits, black-nobility-posts the-black-nobility-archon-families orisni. jesuitswampleader control the negative police and polarize political parties through Knights of Columbus: vatican-death-squad-of-columbus Knights_of_Columbus Their current leader is Patrick Kelly , educated by Jesuits :   wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_E._Kelly   "a bachelor's degree in economics from Marquette University " " a law degree from Marquette University Law School in 1993. [3]   Founder of The Knights of Columbus was Irish :  " American Catholic priest based in New Haven, Connecticut . He founded the Knights of Columbus ...
Read more

The R1b-M222 Genetic Expansion and the Khazar Invasion Timeline

Here's a breakdown of what this article covers: It introduces the R1b-M222 haplogroup: This is a genetic marker found on the male Y-chromosome, known to be very common in Ireland and Scotland. It explains the estimated time of the major R1b-M222 expansion: Based on genetic studies, this lineage significantly increased and spread in Ireland and Scotland around the mid-1st millennium CE (specifically 174-524 CE, with a likely point around 349 CE). The article notes this aligns with historical accounts of the Scoti migration. It introduces a different historical narrative about the Khazar invasion: This narrative, found in sources like cobramap.blogspot.com ("Archons" text), assigns a specific date to a Khazar invasion: 393 CE. It highlights the stated purpose of this Khazar invasion: According to that specific narrative, the purpose was to suppress spiritual knowledge and replace it with a form of mind programming. It points out the striking chronological proximity: T...
Read more

Irish & Scottish Genetics Connections

Image
 Introduction: More Than Neighbors: Unpacking the Deep and Enduring Connection Between Ireland and Scotland Have you ever noticed the striking similarities between Irish and Scottish culture? Beyond the shared love of a good ceilidh or a dram of whiskey, there's a deep and enduring connection between these two nations that goes back centuries. They're more than just neighbors separated by a narrow stretch of sea; they are, in many ways, intertwined threads of a common Celtic tapestry. But what are the roots of this profound link? And for those who might be skeptical, what evidence exists to prove this shared heritage? Let's delve into the fascinating story. Geography: Where the Land and Sea Connect Us Look at a map, and the most obvious connection becomes clear: geography. Ireland and Scotland are geographically close, with the North Channel acting not as a barrier, but historically, as a highway. For centuries, the seas around these islands facilitated trade, cultura...
Read more